The Reasonableness of Christianity Blog

As I mentioned before , my interest in history and sociology was piqued around 2013 when I first read a couple now obscure books by Carroll Quigley from the 1960s. It was astonishing to me how different the tone was from anything that could have been published by a respected academic in 2013. (Partly, that he appreciated the societal importance of religious beliefs, appreciated The West, and wasn't afraid to talk about the positive influence of both.) I feel the same when I read, for example, John Locke, or Arnold Toynbee, or Eric Voegelin (who I only recently heard of and just started reading) - a glowing feeling like the Renaissance scholars must have felt as they unearthed the long-lost wisdom of the ancients. Only this time, oddly, it is wisdom possessed by scholars still alive in the 1970s and 1980s. It is wisdom long-lost only because this wisdom became unfashionable. A generation of academics deliberately buried this knowledge (what I called the History Coup ) and placed a c

TL;DR: Synopsis and takeaways from an email conversation with the Christian apologists who created a YouTube video spreading salacious and disturbing misinformation about my religious beliefs. This is my 4th and final post on what I have called "unhinged Category 2 rhetoric" against The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This rhetoric consists of absurd and salacious false ("unhinged") claims about The Church and its members intended for a mainstream Christian audience (See Part 1 ). The goal seems to be to inculcate in mainstream Christians an instinctual aversion to The Church, in order to counter the missionary efforts of The Church which are seen as a problem for mainstream Christianity. Unfortunately, these attacks lead not only to an instinctual aversion to the The Church, but also to its human members. The result can be (and has been for my family) deeply un-Christian behavior toward us (see Part 3 for the story) from mainstream Christians steeped

  TL;DR - Rather than answering the question “Why did God create Evil?”, Latter Day Saints need to answer the question “Does God have power to vanquish Evil?”. Scholar James McLachlan argues that the solution for the Latter Day Saint is that Evil, and all that associate with it, will shrivel away and dissipate in face of the loving goodness of the Kingdom of God which will eventually fill the earth. McLachlan places emphasis on the importance of community within LDS theology, and how obedience to eternal principles will lead people to join together. This raises a concern to me that too much emphasis is placed on human agency and individual power, which diminishes God’s role in the world which He has created. "St. Michael Vanquishing Satan" by Raphael Why am I starting this off with an epic picture of St. Michel spearing Satan? You'll have to wait and see! I want to base this post off of some comments made in response to my last post. Thank you to Stephen Lyndsay for these

TL;DR - Latter Day Saints need to answer different questions posed by the Problem of Evil due to their belief about divine omnipotence and creation.  Hi all - just a few thoughts I’ve been having during a busy term of school! I recently made the decision to pursue studying a Latter Day Saint Theodicy as my Religious Studies capstone at Lawrence, and I received a grant to do some studies out at the Maxwell Institute of Religious Scholarship in Utah at the close of this term. In preparation, I’ve been considering how Latter Day Saints think about the problem of evil differently, and in discussing this with my capstone advisor, the issue of omnipotence seems to come to the forefront; specifically, the nature of omnipotence as we attribute it to our God.  Omnipotence is a complicated issue for a thousand reasons. Could God create a rock so large that he couldn’t move? Can God create nonsense objects, such as a circular cube? Are there states of affairs that an omnipotent being cannot bring

This the third post in a series about what I am calling Category 2 rhetoric against The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints - rhetoric directed toward Christians who are not members of the The Church of Jesus Christ, to discourage them from wanting to learn more about The Church. These posts were inspired by a video I came across called "How to Talk to a Mormon," introduced in the first post . The second post was the full text of an email conversation with Tim Hull, a creator of the video. Update 11/27/21: The fourth post describes the reaction of the creators of the "How to Talk to a Mormon" video to my concerns about some of the claims in the video. Category 1 rhetoric is attacks directed toward members of The Church in an attempt to shake their faith. Category 2 rhetoric is an example of what is called  poisoning the well , prophylactically discrediting and ridiculing The Church and its members in the eyes of other Christians. Poisoning the well is some

TL;DR John Locke, poster child of the Enlightenment, wrote “The Reasonableness of Christianity” to address two still-relevant burning questions: A) What does it mean to be Christian?, and B) How should we understand the relationship between Christianity and reason? Locke’s approach was not an attempt to prove Christianity, but to set forth a worldview. I break this worldview into 4 components: An inclusive and uniting vision of Christianity Christian faith that is strengthened and confirmed by reason Rationality that is strengthened and directed by Christian convictions and morality A belief that personal happiness and societal prosperity are most likely to be realized through the application of Christianity and rationality The mission of this blog (The Reasonableness of Christianity Blog) is to foster understanding, hope, and harmony in some small way, by promoting and applying this Lockean worldview in a society in which both Christianity and rationality are losing their footho

This is the full text of an email conversation with Tim Hull, a creator of the "How to Talk to a Mormon" video, containing Category 2 rhetoric against The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (ie arguments intended to dissuade Christians who are not members of the Church from engaging with the Church or its members). See here for background. More discussion to come in future blog posts. Update 11/27/21: This is the second of a series of four posts on unhinged Category 2 rhetoric against the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The third post in this series discusses the harms of this rhetoric, as experienced by my family. The fourth post describes the reaction of the creators of the "How to Talk to a Mormon" video to my concerns about some of the claims in the video.

With religion on the decline in the West, I am sure by now all Christians have grown accustomed to fending off attacks on their faith, while increasing numbers are daily falling prey to the rhetoric and losing their faith. Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, like me, are susceptible to the general secular arguments against religion and Christianity as well as more targeted arguments against our peculiar version of Christianity. Directed attacks on the Church of Jesus Christ fall into two broad categories with different target audiences:  Rhetoric directed toward members of The Church of Jesus Christ aiming to dislodge their faith in the Church and its teachings. This type of argument often has as a subject unsettling events from church history or attempts to discredit modern revelations and scriptures. These arguments may come from people outside the church, including from other religions, but the most vehement and persistent voices are often disaffected former