The Reasonableness of Christianity Blog

  TL;DR - Rather than answering the question “Why did God create Evil?”, Latter Day Saints need to answer the question “Does God have power to vanquish Evil?”. Scholar James McLachlan argues that the solution for the Latter Day Saint is that Evil, and all that associate with it, will shrivel away and dissipate in face of the loving goodness of the Kingdom of God which will eventually fill the earth. McLachlan places emphasis on the importance of community within LDS theology, and how obedience to eternal principles will lead people to join together. This raises a concern to me that too much emphasis is placed on human agency and individual power, which diminishes God’s role in the world which He has created. "St. Michael Vanquishing Satan" by Raphael Why am I starting this off with an epic picture of St. Michel spearing Satan? You'll have to wait and see! I want to base this post off of some comments made in response to my last post. Thank you to Stephen Lyndsay for these

TL;DR - Latter Day Saints need to answer different questions posed by the Problem of Evil due to their belief about divine omnipotence and creation.  Hi all - just a few thoughts I’ve been having during a busy term of school! I recently made the decision to pursue studying a Latter Day Saint Theodicy as my Religious Studies capstone at Lawrence, and I received a grant to do some studies out at the Maxwell Institute of Religious Scholarship in Utah at the close of this term. In preparation, I’ve been considering how Latter Day Saints think about the problem of evil differently, and in discussing this with my capstone advisor, the issue of omnipotence seems to come to the forefront; specifically, the nature of omnipotence as we attribute it to our God.  Omnipotence is a complicated issue for a thousand reasons. Could God create a rock so large that he couldn’t move? Can God create nonsense objects, such as a circular cube? Are there states of affairs that an omnipotent being cannot bring

This the third post in a series about what I am calling Category 2 rhetoric against The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints - rhetoric directed toward Christians who are not members of the The Church of Jesus Christ, to discourage them from wanting to learn more about The Church. These posts were inspired by a video I came across called "How to Talk to a Mormon," introduced in the first post . The second post was the full text of an email conversation with Tim Hull, a creator of the video. Update 11/27/21: The fourth post describes the reaction of the creators of the "How to Talk to a Mormon" video to my concerns about some of the claims in the video. Category 1 rhetoric is attacks directed toward members of The Church in an attempt to shake their faith. Category 2 rhetoric is an example of what is called  poisoning the well , prophylactically discrediting and ridiculing The Church and its members in the eyes of other Christians. Poisoning the well is some

TL;DR John Locke, poster child of the Enlightenment, wrote “The Reasonableness of Christianity” to address two still-relevant burning questions: A) What does it mean to be Christian?, and B) How should we understand the relationship between Christianity and reason? Locke’s approach was not an attempt to prove Christianity, but to set forth a worldview. I break this worldview into 4 components: An inclusive and uniting vision of Christianity Christian faith that is strengthened and confirmed by reason Rationality that is strengthened and directed by Christian convictions and morality A belief that personal happiness and societal prosperity are most likely to be realized through the application of Christianity and rationality The mission of this blog (The Reasonableness of Christianity Blog) is to foster understanding, hope, and harmony in some small way, by promoting and applying this Lockean worldview in a society in which both Christianity and rationality are losing their footho

This is the full text of an email conversation with Tim Hull, a creator of the "How to Talk to a Mormon" video, containing Category 2 rhetoric against The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (ie arguments intended to dissuade Christians who are not members of the Church from engaging with the Church or its members). See here for background. More discussion to come in future blog posts. Update 11/27/21: This is the second of a series of four posts on unhinged Category 2 rhetoric against the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The third post in this series discusses the harms of this rhetoric, as experienced by my family. The fourth post describes the reaction of the creators of the "How to Talk to a Mormon" video to my concerns about some of the claims in the video.

With religion on the decline in the West, I am sure by now all Christians have grown accustomed to fending off attacks on their faith, while increasing numbers are daily falling prey to the rhetoric and losing their faith. Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, like me, are susceptible to the general secular arguments against religion and Christianity as well as more targeted arguments against our peculiar version of Christianity. Directed attacks on the Church of Jesus Christ fall into two broad categories with different target audiences:  Rhetoric directed toward members of The Church of Jesus Christ aiming to dislodge their faith in the Church and its teachings. This type of argument often has as a subject unsettling events from church history or attempts to discredit modern revelations and scriptures. These arguments may come from people outside the church, including from other religions, but the most vehement and persistent voices are often disaffected former

[Update added 10-5-21] I’m reading Joseph Henrich’s The WEIRDest People in the World: How the West Became Psychologically Peculiar and Particularly Prosperous - or rather listening to it on Audible . I mentioned this book as part of The Return of Civilization , as one of a suite of recent works that seem like they “admit the uniqueness and advanced development of Western Civilization … but neglect the central role of Christian principles in its development”.  After listening to most of the book I think my assessment is sort of right, but also sort of unfair. The acronym WEIRD stands for Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic, and also calls out his thesis that people from this type of culture (my culture) are exceptional, or at least different from the rest of the world, both in terms of location (West vs. non-West) and time (Modern-West vs non-Modern-West). The best thing about this book (other than the cool acronym in the title, of course) is the cornucopia of psych